Brackeen v. Haaland could change the future of Indigenous rights.
At
age nine, tragedy struck Autumn Adams’ life. Her father passed away and
her mother was deemed unfit to care for her, leaving Adams with an
uncertain future.
Adams, who is a member of the Yakama Nation,
a federally recognized Native tribe, recalls overhearing officers from
Child Protective Services discuss the possibility of moving her to a
non-Native home if they couldn’t soon find a Native family to place her
with. The idea terrified her.
“At that point in my life, I had everything I recognized as home ripped away from me," she tells Teen Vogue.
"I had to bury my father. I had to be ripped from my mother's arms. The
only thing that was left that gave me that connection was my extended
family and culture.”
Adams
was eventually placed with family in a multigenerational home that
included her maternal aunt and grandmother. Now a law student, Adams
credits this upbringing with enabling her to stay close to her culture
and achieve success. “I was directly able to learn from my aunt, my
cousins, my grandmother, my other aunts and uncles during that time —
what it means to have perseverance, what it means to have responsibility
and respect, the definition of grit,” she explains. “It's through those
lessons that I've broken every negative statistic not only about former
foster youth but about Native former foster youth.”
In November,
the Supreme Court heard arguments for a case that could forever change
the landscape of adoption for Native youth like Adams.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave a comment.