BACK UP BLOG (no longer updating)

This blog was a backup for American Indian Adoptees blog
USE THE SEARCH BAR or SEARCH TOPICS at bottom of this blog

If you need support

Support Info: If you are a Survivor and need emotional support, a national crisis line is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week: Residential School Survivor Support Line: 1-866-925-4419. Additional Health Support Information: Emotional, cultural, and professional support services are also available to Survivors and their families through the Indian Residential Schools Resolution Health Support Program. Services can be accessed on an individual, family, or group basis.” These & regional support phone numbers are found at https://nctr.ca/contact/survivors/ . MY EMAIL: tracelara@pm.me

Search This Blog

Tuesday, February 18, 2014

Five Categories of Adoptees Missing from the "Vocal Minority"

I want you all to read this post by Rebecca Hawkes and let me know where you land on this list and how you feel about it.


Sea Glass & Other Fragments: Five Categories of Adoptees Missing from the "Vocal Minority...: That phrase, "they don't talk about being adopted so they don't care about it." Don't use silence to dismiss thoughts...



My thoughts: Without the internet, I wouldn't even have this blog AMERICAN INDIAN ADOPTEES or even know about the above post. I wouldn't be able to read the voices, views and written words of the adopted. In a real sense, I would not have moved from the thick dark fog to the "knowing" place where I am today.   By the way, I am still changing - every - single - day.  I cannot believe how different I am since I started ONE SMALL SACRIFICE to the next book TWO WORLDS.  I have not been threatened by anyone to shut up about my views on adoption -- well,  not yet anyway.  I am not a silenced adoptee though I am sure there are people who wish I would just stop reporting on issues like the Baby Veronica case.  I can see clearly that denying this horrific history only dooms us to repeat it. I can see that the Indian Adoption Projects was ANCESTRICIDE - a way to extract Indians from tribal rolls and make us American-protypes. These projects and programs erased our ancestry and identity in sealed closed adoptions.  This was genocide for many tribes.  I do not judge those who adopted us. I do not expect an apology from the American government or even an acknowledgment of what they did.  I judge the governments and individuals who created adoption programs to remove Indian children from their families....That was an atrocity and evil... Trace

Friday, February 14, 2014

Adoption From a Native American Perspective

Leland Morrill, adopted from the Navajo Nation
Leland Morrill was estranged from his Navajo lineage for twenty years. Today, as an author, advocate, and speaker, Morrill shares the unique perspective of how adoption is viewed by Native American family and culture, through the eyes of an adult adoptee.

Leland Morrill was born in 1966, on sovereign land, in the Navajo Nation, within the state of Arizona. He was not issued a birth certificate, and does not know the exact date of his birth. His young, unwed mother was his sole caretaker for the first few years of his life, and according to Leland, this wasn’t unusual in Native American culture.
“Marriage is a Christian concept, not Native,” said Morrill. “Many people from my parent’s generation weren’t married. It’s a very matriarchal society. When you’re born, you take on your mother’s last name, you go to your mother’s family, and the women decide whether the men stay around after the children are born. That’s the way it was. ”
When Leland was two years old, his mother suffered a fatal head injury after flipping her car on a bridge in Albuquerque New Mexico. It was September 1968; Leland was two years old.
“My brother and I went to St. Anthony’s orphanage, where they figured out that we were Navajo, and took us back to the reservation to stay with my grandmother. In our culture, once your mother dies, your next caretakers are your aunts and grandmothers. They are considered your mothers,” said Morrill.
Less than a year after being placed in the care of his grandmother, Leland was taken to the Indian Health Services Hospital for a minor burn on his foot. After Leland was treated, he was taken to another hospital in Gallup, New Mexico, where the Bureau of Indian Affairs decided to investigate.
“They saw poor people, Indians. My grandmother was a sheepherder, living on an Indian reservation without electricity,” Morrill said. “My relatives couldn’t speak English, so they said— ‘we don’t know if these people are your relatives or not, so we are going to take you.’”
Leland was immediately removed from his home and placed with an adoptive couple looking for Native American children to foster and adopt. The day after he was adopted, the family moved to Ontario, Canada, severing all ties Leland had to his biological, Native American family.
Not uncommon for the times, before 1978, when Congress passed the Indian Child Welfare Act, a very high number of Indian children were removed from their homes by public and private agencies and placed in non-Indian foster and adoptive homes or institutions. Leland, who was part of the Amicus Group that went to DC to attend the argument on behalf of Dusten Brown and the Cherokee Nation in the “Baby Veronica” adoption case, explained that there are new laws and bills being passed currently to help further protect biological families. One bill in particular, the Oklahoma Truth In Adoption Act (HB 1118), urges judges to consider the biological family members first before allowing a child to be placed with non-related adoptive parents by an adoption agency.  
“From a human trafficking point of view, I was trafficked,” said Morrill. “Every time they adopted a child, they went to another country. They adopted seven more children when we got to Canada, and then we moved right after that. They separated us from our cultures.”

“They trained us within the Mormon ideology; they thought they were saving us. They thought they were doing the right thing, and from that perspective they were good people. But from a Native American perspective—they were not.”
Leland Morrill returned to his mother’s clan, the Many Goats Clan, for the first time in 1989, to be greeted with open arms by his grandmother and his cousins. “I was a little freaked out, like—wow! this is what I would have been raised like.”
“I tell Native American adoptees like myself—yes, this is what happened to you. You were trafficked. But you have to get past that. Consider yourselves different, because you were forced to assimilate into a different culture. But use that assimilation in your favor—whatever education or opportunities were presented to you that others on the reservation didn’t have, you can come back and use them to help your people.”

For more about Leland’s story, read: Two Worlds: Lost Children of the Indian Adoption Projects

Tuesday, February 11, 2014

Operation Papoose 1964

The inventor of the INDIAN ADOPTION PROJECT, Arnold Lyslo, went to Florida to set-up a new Adoption Agency for Indians, calling it OPERATION PAPOOOSE - this article was published in the Miami News on July 25, 1964 - saying that "...INDIAN children will be much easier to adopt than white children..."... the devastation Lyslo created is still being felt across Indian Country.

Research for the new anthology CALLED HOME



CLICK TO READ: http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=HLEzAAAAIBAJ&sjid=N-oFAAAAIBAJ&pg=2578%2C3164057

Operation Papoose 1964

The inventor of the INDIAN ADOPTION PROJECT, Arnold Lyslo, went to Florida to set-up a new Adoption Agency for Indians, calling it OPERATION PAPOOOSE - this article was published in the Miami News on July 25, 1964 - saying that "...INDIAN children will be much easier to adopt than white children..."... the devastation Lyslo created is still being felt across Indian Country.






Research for the new anthology CALLED HOME







CLICK TO READ: http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=HLEzAAAAIBAJ&sjid=N-oFAAAAIBAJ&pg=2578%2C3164057

Operation Papoose 1964

The inventor of the INDIAN ADOPTION PROJECT, Arnold Lyslo, went to Florida to set-up a new Adoption Agency for Indians, calling it OPERATION PAPOOOSE - this article was published in the Miami News on July 25, 1964 - saying that "...INDIAN children will be much easier to adopt than white children..."... the devastation Lyslo created is still being felt across Indian Country.

Research for the new anthology CALLED HOME



CLICK TO READ: http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=HLEzAAAAIBAJ&sjid=N-oFAAAAIBAJ&pg=2578%2C3164057

Operation Papoose 1964

The inventor of the INDIAN ADOPTION PROJECT, Arnold Lyslo, went to Florida to set-up a new Adoption Agency for Indians, calling it OPERATION PAPOOOSE - this article was published in the Miami News on July 25, 1964 - saying that "...INDIAN children will be much easier to adopt than white children..."... the devastation Lyslo created is still being felt across Indian Country.

Research for the new anthology CALLED HOME



CLICK TO READ: http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=HLEzAAAAIBAJ&sjid=N-oFAAAAIBAJ&pg=2578%2C3164057

Operation Papoose 1964

The inventor of the INDIAN ADOPTION PROJECT, Arnold Lyslo, went to Florida to set-up a new Adoption Agency for Indians, calling it OPERATION PAPOOOSE - this article was published in the Miami News on July 25, 1964 - saying that "...INDIAN children will be much easier to adopt than white children..."... the devastation Lyslo created is still being felt across Indian Country.

Research for the new anthology CALLED HOME



CLICK TO READ: http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=HLEzAAAAIBAJ&sjid=N-oFAAAAIBAJ&pg=2578%2C3164057

Operation Papoose 1964

The inventor of the INDIAN ADOPTION PROJECT, Arnold Lyslo, went to Florida to set-up a new Adoption Agency for Indians, calling it OPERATION PAPOOOSE - this article was published in the Miami News on July 25, 1964 - saying that "...INDIAN children will be much easier to adopt than white children..."... the devastation Lyslo created is still being felt across Indian Country.

Research for the new anthology CALLED HOME



CLICK TO READ: http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=HLEzAAAAIBAJ&sjid=N-oFAAAAIBAJ&pg=2578%2C3164057

Operation Papoose #Adoption PRE-ICWA

The inventor of the INDIAN ADOPTION PROJECT, Arnold Lyslo, went to Florida to set-up a new Adoption Agency for Indians, calling it OPERATION PAPOOOSE - this article was published in the Miami News on July 25, 1964 - saying that "...INDIAN children will be much easier to adopt than white children..."... the devastation Lyslo created is still being felt across Indian Country.

Research for the new anthology CALLED HOME



CLICK TO READ: http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=HLEzAAAAIBAJ&sjid=N-oFAAAAIBAJ&pg=2578%2C3164057

Maine Wabanaki-State Child Welfare Truth & Reconciliation Commission (TRC) is celebrating its one year anniversary



Post by Maine Wabanaki-State Child Welfare Truth and Reconciliation Commission.


Today marks the One Year Anniversary of the Commissioners being seated. Happy Day to the TRC!
The Maine Wabanaki-State Child Welfare Truth & Reconciliation Commission (TRC) is celebrating its one year anniversary! Created to uncover, document and explore the experiences of Wabanaki individuals with the state child welfare system, the TRC has spent this past year actively engaging with Wabanaki communities, DHHS workers and non-native community members from across the state.
Formally seated last February, the five Commissioners: Carol Wishcamper, gkisedtanamoogk, Sandy White Hawk, Matt Dunlap and Gail Werrbach, have been busy setting the Mandate into action. In addition to meeting the logistical needs of establishing a functioning TRC, the Commission has been visiting regularly with native communities to create working relationships and foster meaningful conversations. The TRC held its first official community listening session at Sipayik in November of 2013, and is scheduled to attend events at each of the remaining tribal communities and Wabanaki Health and Wellness before this year is out. Commissioners will also be attending private statement gathering sessions within communities and the TRC will be hosting several public events across the state.
In addition to facilitating structured truth commission listening sessions, the Commission has been actively working to promote understanding of the TRC and its process through events such as recent engagements with Justice Albie Sachs of South Africa and Commissioner gkisedtanamoogk's recent TEDx talk.
While it has been only one year since the five Commissioners were seated, there is an undeniable sense of urgency within the TRC. Under the formal Mandate signed in 2012 by all five tribal chiefs and the governor of the State of Maine, the Commission has just eighteen months remaining in which to complete its task. At the close of this time, a final report will be issued and disseminated across the state, summarizing the findings of the Commission as well as making formal recommendations. Despite the tight time frame, expectations are high. "It is a remarkable group," observed Commissioner Dunlap, "We have a lot to do, but certainly the right people to do it."
In carrying the work forward, the Commission continues to work closely with Maine Wabanaki REACH, a cross-cultural organization working to ensure that the voices of Wabanaki people are heard and their experiences respected.

For More Information, visit the website, www.MaineWabanakiTRC.org or their FaceBook page - or phone the office at 207. 664.0280.
Maine Wabanaki-State Child Welfare TRC is the nation's first TRC to address child welfare and native people - formerly Maine Tribal-State Child Welfare TRC
 
RELATED STORY (please click and watch the videos)


Monday, February 3, 2014

Letter From National Native Groups to DOJ to Investigate Child Welfare Issues

... we all prayed for this a very long time...Trace

READ Here, from NICWA, NCAI, NARF, and AAIA:
The undersigned American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) organizations request that the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice commences a prompt  investigation into the unlawful treatment of AI/AN children in the private adoption and public child welfare systems throughout the United States.
 ***
Yet, despite all the protections provided by ICWA, each year thousands of parents, grandparents, aunties, uncles, and child advocates reach out to the National Indian Child Welfare Association (NICWA) desperate for help. Their rights under ICWA and the Constitution continue to be violated by state child welfare and private adoption systems. NICWA frequently hears stories of adoption agencies ignoring the tribal membership of
children, of state attorneys failing to provide notice to a tribe when a child is taken into custody, of child welfare workers sometimes knowingly placing children outside ICWA’s placement preferences, and of judges denying tribal representatives a presence in the court room. NICWA also often hears stories of Guardians ad Litem scoffing at the importance of Native culture, state workers demeaning AI/AN parents and traditional
ways of parenting, and attorneys using professional networks to encourage other attorneys to purposefully circumvent the “ridiculous” or “unnecessary” adoption requirements of ICWA.
ICWA SUMMIT 2013

Wednesday, January 29, 2014

#BabyVeronica - Yale Conference in February

Yale NALSA Event on Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl


Deconstructing the “Baby Veronica” Case: Implications for the Future of the Indian Child Welfare Act

Friday, February 21, 5:15-6:45 p.m.
Yale Law School, New Haven, CT
Panelists:
  • Jacqueline Pata, Executive Director, National Congress of American Indians
  • Joel West Williams, Staff Attorney, Native American Rights Fund
In June 2013, the Supreme Court decided Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, a widely publicized case involving the adoption of a Cherokee child by non-Natives over the objections of her Cherokee father. At the heart of the controversy was the Indian Child Welfare Act, a federal law designed to protect the best interests of Native children and promote the stability and security of Indian tribes and families. This panel will explore the history behind this landmark law, the current landscape of Indian child welfare, and the implications of the “Baby Veronica” decision for the future placement of Native children. Additionally, panelists will discuss how their organizations collaborated with both tribal and non-tribal stakeholders to develop legal, media, and other advocacy strategies for the case as part of the Tribal Supreme Court Project.

Registration: http://www.rsvpbook.com/event.php?439305

Note from Trace: I will be there and will let you know details afterwards on this blog... If you remember I wrote several posts on this blog and was published nationally in Indian Country Today Media about this case. I conferred with NCAI as well. My feelings now? I believe the Dept. Of Justice needs to interview Veronica's birthmother about her dealings with the Nightlight Adoption Agency. We need the truth and I do not believe we have it yet. In my humble view, this case is not over.

Tuesday, January 28, 2014

Adoption Reunion in the Social Media Age: An interview with Becky Drinnen



By Trace A. DeMeyer (author of One Small Sacrifice and Two Worlds)


Becky Drinnen and I are adoptees, writers and contributors to the new anthology “Adoption Reunion in the Social Media Age.” The editor Laura Dennis asked us to discuss our stories in the book and ask each other questions for our blogs. The new book will be released January 27 on Amazon and is available as an ebook on Kindle (for e-readers). (ISBN: 978-0985616847)


TRACE:  Becky and I were both named Laura before adoption… how amazing is that synchronicity… So Becky, you and I began our search the old way, before the internet. If you were asked advice by an adoptee who is still searching, what would you recommend as far as how to search, and what about using social media?


BECKY:  Why am I not surprised that we were both named Laura before we were adopted?  I can't tell you how many times I have connected with women named Laura!   I think it began with my childhood infatuation with Little House on the Prairie author Laura Ingalls Wilder. (I STILL love those books!) In the past few years I've connected with several Lauras -- including Laura Dennis, the editor of "Adoption Reunion in the Social Media Age"! 
Search and reunion is a very personal experience.  Every search will be unique.  For those still searching, I think it is important to know that many adoptees have been reunited with their parents without access to their original birth certificates.  Reach out to search angels in your state for advice and assistance.  Keep in mind that at times the key to your search may be in a dusty file cabinet or sitting on a library shelf.  Just because you can't complete your search online doesn't mean the information isn't available to you.  In my case, I didn't even have my father's name when I started my search.  With some adoptee intuition and a lot of work, I found what I searched for.  Don't get discouraged! 
The Internet has not only put search tools such as Spokeo, Google and Facebook  at the fingertips of those searching,  it has also given adoptees, birth parents, and adoptive parents a public voice.   The Internet gives authors the opportunity to spread the word about their books via Social Media, blogs, and Amazon. And there are many, many GOOD books out there that chronicle the adoption experience and offer search tips and advice.  My advice would be for any adoptee searching would be to get educated!  Read, learn and participate in discussions, and get involved.  And reach out to others.   This will help you in your search and will help you anticipate the variety of reactions you might experience.  And believe me, it will be emotional!  I really can't say enough about being emotionally prepared for whatever you might find at the end of your search.    When I found my mother, I wasn't prepared for rejection.  Then, many years later, I met my father and found I wasn't prepared to be welcomed with open arms. 
Social media is widely used by adoptees and birth parents as a tool to communicate and gather information.  Facebook opened doors to me and helped me learn that my brother and I both know some of the same people!  So, here's what I believe:  What others post on social media sites and make publicly available is fair game.   Feel free to explore what is publicly available.      I also think social media is a great way to keep in contact once ongoing contact has been agreed upon.  However, in most cases, I don't think social media is a good way to make initial contact with a parent or child.  Social media is a wonderful tool, but it needs to be used carefully.


TRACE:  Adoptees have to deal with “the fog” and fantasy. Usually we guess or dream up what our first parents are like and only know what our adoptive parents tell us.  Did your adoptive parents tell you anything about your first family and did they support you searching for them?


BECKY:  My adoptive parents were always very open with me about the fact that I was adopted.  However, they knew very little about my birth family.  The only fact that they remembered was that my birth mother had red hair.  Of course, once I learned that, every time I saw a woman with red hair, I looked for resemblance.  I dreamed up stories in my head about her searching for me.   As a teenager, I was obsessed with questions about my birth family.  I wonder if I would have been more at ease with being adopted if my parents had been provided with more information -- in writing -- about my birth family. 
My Mom said that my birth mother was mentioned when they first "met" me at the adoption agency, but they were so excited about meeting me that they remembered very little of that conversation.  My parents kept a very extensive file of everything they received, and there was no additional information provided about my birth family in that information. 
Interestingly, they were given a booklet called "All About Me", which contained information about what I ate, sleep habits, etc.  Apparently the adoption agency didn't feel any background about my birth family was important for me to know. 
I did not tell my parents prior to searching.  I knew my Dad would be okay with me searching, but I wasn't so sure about Mom.  For most of my teenage years, when I was angry with her for establishing a curfew, or sending me to my room for hitting my brother,  I would tell her that my "real" mother wouldn't treat me that way.  I know I hurt her deeply at that point in time.  By the time I searched, I was on good terms with both of my parents, but I felt strongly that this was something I needed to do on my own. 
I did tell them about my search about a year after I found my birth mother.  She declined contact, but I had some limited contact with her sister, my aunt.  My aunt provided me with pictures of my mother, my grandparents, and my brother and sisters.  I started this conversation with my adoptive parents by showing them pictures!   They were supportive and curious.  I've always had quite the independent streak, and they knew I've always had questions, so I don't think my search shocked them.   I do wonder if my Mom would have reacted differently if I had established ongoing contact with my mother. 
Twenty-plus years passed between the time I told my parents about finding my mother to the time I met my father.  By that time my Dad had passed away.  Once again, I conducted this search without my Mom's knowledge.  Once again, I opened up my conversation about meeting my father with pictures!  After I told Mom the story about how I learned his identity, then walked up to him at a public event and introduced myself to him, her first comment was:  "I wonder what he thought about how you were raised"?  She is comfortable with my ongoing contact with my father. 


TRACE:  I grew up in northern Wisconsin and some of my first family lived there also. But I didn’t know this. I’m sure I’m not the first person to wonder if I dated someone who could have been a cousin, sibling or blood relative. You also grew up near relatives. Is it possible you met someone in your family and didn’t even know? Did that ever concern you when you were dating?


BECKY:  Growing up, no, it never crossed my mind that I might date or be in contact with a blood relative.  I was born in Cleveland, Ohio and grew up in a small town across the state, 200 miles away.  I always felt very far away from my biological family; I just assumed that they were from the Cleveland area, so why would they ever end up in a tiny little town across the state.
When I found my birth mother in the early '80's, she was living not in Cleveland, but in Columbus, less than 100 miles from where I live.  That still felt far away to me -- I never thought it was in the realm of possibility that I would become acquainted with a family member.  Imagine my surprise when, thanks to that mutual friend feature on Facebook, I discovered that my brother works with a friend of mine, eight miles from my house.  In a moment, I learned that what I never imagined possible was, in fact, real.  And it doesn't stop there.  As I have become more and more vocal about my experience as an adoptee, I have learned that several other friends and acquaintances know my brother through their work. I do believe that, at some point, I will meet my brother. 
I recently saw or read a story about a birth mother/daughter reunion where mother and daughter realized they had been connected during the daughter's growing up years.   Mother had been a school bus driver, and after some discussion, they realized that she had been the driver for her daughter's school bus route!  I always felt like I would "know" it if I met a birth family member.  This story illustrates to me that what I believed may not always be true. 


TRACE:  Some of us deal with rejection by our first families. My mother Helen chose not to meet me but did send my birthfather’s name after I wrote her a second letter. You have not met your mother (not as yet) but did speak to her… Do you think this new book could change your mother’s mind about having contact with you and suggest a reunion?


BECKY:  Trace, I hurt for you as you ask this question.  And I hurt for me.  I was still firmly entrenched in the "adoption fog" when my birth mother refused contact with me.  In fact, I knew very little about adoption issues at that point in my life.  I SO wish resources such as Laura's anthology had been available to me to help me through the search and reunion process and to help me understand many of the issues faced by all of those affected by adoption. 
I learned how my mother's sister perceived the circumstances of my conception and placement for adoption almost 30 years ago.  However, it wasn't until I reached out to my mother again in 2011 and had a conversation with her that I really understood how deeply affected she had been by getting pregnant and being shamed by her parents.  I came away from our conversation with the realization that she has never healed from placing her first child for adoption.  She did what her parents and social workers told her to do... she walked away from the hospital and never spoke of me again. Not even to the man she married three years after my birth.  Yet she still remembered the name she gave me.  And she told me she thinks of me every day.  She didn't forget.
I can't pretend to know all of the thoughts that run through her mind.  What I do believe is that she has a lot of healing to do before she will be in a place to be ready to meet me.  And I believe that studying the issues faced by adoptees and birth parents is an important step in healing.  The adoptee and birth parent community has been a tremendous source of information, support and healing for me.  And I believe that, if my mother would read books like “Adoption Reunion in the Social Media Age”, she would begin to have the tools to heal. And the courage to reach out to others who share her experience.   She would realize the impact of adoption for adoptees.  And she would be able to identify with the stories of other mothers who lost children to adoption.  If this were to happen, I believe she might have a change of heart about meeting me. 

***I want to thank Becky for sharing her thoughts and story with this blog, American Indian Adoptees. Do you have a question you’d like to ask us?

This is cross-posted at www.splitfeather.blogspot.com and at www.tracedemeyer.com.

My interview is here: http://puzzlesandpossibilities.com/2014/01/29/adoption-reunion-in-the-social-media-age-an-interview-with-trace-a-demeyer/

BONUS: Please leave a comment and one of you will be chosen to receive a FREE COPY OF THE EBOOK (Kindle or pdf)...


Friday, January 24, 2014

Together we can change history #HeartsontheGround


Lakota People's Law Project





We are on the verge of an historic moment in Lakota history.


Lakota People's Law Project is launching the Campaign to Free Lakota Children, with a national petition (click to sign it here), calling
on President Obama to authorize the grants needed to start tribal
foster care programs, and put us within sight of bringing our children
home.


There is an epidemic of
hundreds of state kidnappings of Native children by South Dakota's
Department of Social Services. Lakota kids are ten times more likely as
non-Native kids to be forcibly removed from their homes and placed in
the foster care system.  The State receives up to $79,000 per Lakota
foster child annually from the federal government.


The Lakota People's Law Project has recently released a new 12-minute video 'Hearts on the Ground",
documenting the heart breaking reality of the South Dakota DSS
illegally denying Lakota grandmothers custody of their own
grandchildren.  Please watch and share this video.  


As part of our new Campaign
to Free the Lakota Children, we would also appreciate the the help of
those supporters who use Twitter to recommend the 'Hearts on the Ground" video  to the popular website Upworthy, with your suggestion to  @Upworthy.


We have the solution: 
Foster care programs run by Lakota tribes, not the culturally biased and
money-motivated DSS of South Dakota.





Please sign the petition--and help spread the word.  Together we can change history.





Wopila  (Many Thanks), 


Chase Iron Eyes 


South Dakota Legal Counsel







Together we can change history #HeartsontheGround

Lakota People's Law Project

We are on the verge of an historic moment in Lakota history.
Lakota People's Law Project is launching the Campaign to Free Lakota Children, with a national petition (click to sign it here), calling on President Obama to authorize the grants needed to start tribal foster care programs, and put us within sight of bringing our children home.
There is an epidemic of hundreds of state kidnappings of Native children by South Dakota's Department of Social Services. Lakota kids are ten times more likely as non-Native kids to be forcibly removed from their homes and placed in the foster care system.  The State receives up to $79,000 per Lakota foster child annually from the federal government.
The Lakota People's Law Project has recently released a new 12-minute video 'Hearts on the Ground", documenting the heart breaking reality of the South Dakota DSS illegally denying Lakota grandmothers custody of their own grandchildren.  Please watch and share this video.  
As part of our new Campaign to Free the Lakota Children, we would also appreciate the the help of those supporters who use Twitter to recommend the 'Hearts on the Ground" video  to the popular website Upworthy, with your suggestion to  @Upworthy.
We have the solution:  Foster care programs run by Lakota tribes, not the culturally biased and money-motivated DSS of South Dakota.

Please sign the petition--and help spread the word.  Together we can change history.

Wopila  (Many Thanks), 
Chase Iron Eyes 
South Dakota Legal Counsel

Together we can change history #HeartsontheGround

Lakota People's Law Project

We are on the verge of an historic moment in Lakota history.
Lakota People's Law Project is launching the Campaign to Free Lakota Children, with a national petition (click to sign it here), calling on President Obama to authorize the grants needed to start tribal foster care programs, and put us within sight of bringing our children home.
There is an epidemic of hundreds of state kidnappings of Native children by South Dakota's Department of Social Services. Lakota kids are ten times more likely as non-Native kids to be forcibly removed from their homes and placed in the foster care system.  The State receives up to $79,000 per Lakota foster child annually from the federal government.
The Lakota People's Law Project has recently released a new 12-minute video 'Hearts on the Ground", documenting the heart breaking reality of the South Dakota DSS illegally denying Lakota grandmothers custody of their own grandchildren.  Please watch and share this video.  
As part of our new Campaign to Free the Lakota Children, we would also appreciate the the help of those supporters who use Twitter to recommend the 'Hearts on the Ground" video  to the popular website Upworthy, with your suggestion to  @Upworthy.
We have the solution:  Foster care programs run by Lakota tribes, not the culturally biased and money-motivated DSS of South Dakota.

Please sign the petition--and help spread the word.  Together we can change history.

Wopila  (Many Thanks), 
Chase Iron Eyes 
South Dakota Legal Counsel

Together we can change history #HeartsontheGround

Lakota People's Law Project

We are on the verge of an historic moment in Lakota history.
Lakota People's Law Project is launching the Campaign to Free Lakota Children, with a national petition (click to sign it here), calling on President Obama to authorize the grants needed to start tribal foster care programs, and put us within sight of bringing our children home.
There is an epidemic of hundreds of state kidnappings of Native children by South Dakota's Department of Social Services. Lakota kids are ten times more likely as non-Native kids to be forcibly removed from their homes and placed in the foster care system.  The State receives up to $79,000 per Lakota foster child annually from the federal government.
The Lakota People's Law Project has recently released a new 12-minute video 'Hearts on the Ground", documenting the heart breaking reality of the South Dakota DSS illegally denying Lakota grandmothers custody of their own grandchildren.  Please watch and share this video.  
As part of our new Campaign to Free the Lakota Children, we would also appreciate the the help of those supporters who use Twitter to recommend the 'Hearts on the Ground" video  to the popular website Upworthy, with your suggestion to  @Upworthy.
We have the solution:  Foster care programs run by Lakota tribes, not the culturally biased and money-motivated DSS of South Dakota.

Please sign the petition--and help spread the word.  Together we can change history.

Wopila  (Many Thanks), 
Chase Iron Eyes 
South Dakota Legal Counsel

Together we can change history #HeartsontheGround

Lakota People's Law Project

We are on the verge of an historic moment in Lakota history.
Lakota People's Law Project is launching the Campaign to Free Lakota Children, with a national petition (click to sign it here), calling on President Obama to authorize the grants needed to start tribal foster care programs, and put us within sight of bringing our children home.
There is an epidemic of hundreds of state kidnappings of Native children by South Dakota's Department of Social Services. Lakota kids are ten times more likely as non-Native kids to be forcibly removed from their homes and placed in the foster care system.  The State receives up to $79,000 per Lakota foster child annually from the federal government.
The Lakota People's Law Project has recently released a new 12-minute video 'Hearts on the Ground", documenting the heart breaking reality of the South Dakota DSS illegally denying Lakota grandmothers custody of their own grandchildren.  Please watch and share this video.  
As part of our new Campaign to Free the Lakota Children, we would also appreciate the the help of those supporters who use Twitter to recommend the 'Hearts on the Ground" video  to the popular website Upworthy, with your suggestion to  @Upworthy.
We have the solution:  Foster care programs run by Lakota tribes, not the culturally biased and money-motivated DSS of South Dakota.

Please sign the petition--and help spread the word.  Together we can change history.

Wopila  (Many Thanks), 
Chase Iron Eyes 
South Dakota Legal Counsel

Together we can change history #HeartsontheGround

Lakota People's Law Project

We are on the verge of an historic moment in Lakota history.
Lakota People's Law Project is launching the Campaign to Free Lakota Children, with a national petition (click to sign it here), calling on President Obama to authorize the grants needed to start tribal foster care programs, and put us within sight of bringing our children home.
There is an epidemic of hundreds of state kidnappings of Native children by South Dakota's Department of Social Services. Lakota kids are ten times more likely as non-Native kids to be forcibly removed from their homes and placed in the foster care system.  The State receives up to $79,000 per Lakota foster child annually from the federal government.
The Lakota People's Law Project has recently released a new 12-minute video 'Hearts on the Ground", documenting the heart breaking reality of the South Dakota DSS illegally denying Lakota grandmothers custody of their own grandchildren.  Please watch and share this video.  
As part of our new Campaign to Free the Lakota Children, we would also appreciate the the help of those supporters who use Twitter to recommend the 'Hearts on the Ground" video  to the popular website Upworthy, with your suggestion to  @Upworthy.
We have the solution:  Foster care programs run by Lakota tribes, not the culturally biased and money-motivated DSS of South Dakota.

Please sign the petition--and help spread the word.  Together we can change history.

Wopila  (Many Thanks), 
Chase Iron Eyes 
South Dakota Legal Counsel

Thursday, January 23, 2014

Death by Boarding School

New Scholarship by Ann Piccard

Ann Piccard has published Death by Boarding School: “The Last Acceptable Racism” and the United States’ Genocide of Native Americans, 49 Gonz. L. Rev. 137 (2014).

A summary:
There is a special kind of racism in this country against Native Americans, and it is the “last acceptable racism.” The author of that poignantly accurate description of most Americans’ attitudes towards Native Americans, who is both a Native American and a Jew, noted,
Not that long ago, white administrators of Indian boarding schools told our children that the “Indian in you shall die.” This kind of treatment and forced thinking has a lasting generational effect. It can be difficult to break through that type of programming.  Many of our people, however, have shaken off these forced ideological shackles to speak the truth and demand long overdue respect. Our voice is getting louder.
Our words are being said with more frequency and emphasis. But people need to hear us. Societal racism should no longer be an ad hoc affair, which is routinely accepted when directed against a certain group. It should be universally condemned. Perpetuating past wrongs and dehumanizing concepts hurts everyone.
This last acceptable racism is rarely mentioned in the U.S. However, one day in a very small town in northern Minnesota, in an area that has been economically depressed ever since the decline of the taconite and iron ore mining industry several decades ago, I watched two Native American men park a pickup truck in front of the local pawn shop.
I could tell the young men were Native Americans only because of the Bois Forte Band license plate on their truck; other than that, they looked, sounded, and acted like most of the other men in that rural north woods town. Upon reflection, of course, I realized that their skin was slightly darker than most residents of the town; I also began to notice that I did not see dark-skinned people working or shopping in any of the town’s stores. My eye was untrained, a fact that I attribute to my upbringing in the Deep South,6 where I was in a small minority of white children who were raised by our parents to see and to protest (and refuse to accept) the prevailing racism toward African-Americans. The subtle differences in appearances between the Native Americans and the “whites” in Minnesota had gone unnoticed by my Southern eyes. But as we watched the young men take their chain saws into the pawnshop that day, my husband remarked that men in northern Minnesota who hock their chain saws must be in pretty bad shape, because how could they survive, let alone make a living, without such tools?

Archive photo

CLICK OLDER POSTS (above) to see more news

CLICK OLDER POSTS  (above) to see more news

MEGWETCH THANK YOU

HUGE Thank you for visiting this blog and sharing this with your kin. It's appreciated. Contact Trace anytime! Use the form below.

BOOKSHOP

Please use BOOKSHOP to buy our titles. We will not be posting links to Amazon.

Popular Posts

To Veronica Brown

Veronica, we adult adoptees are thinking of you today and every day. We will be here when you need us. Your journey in the adopted life has begun, nothing can revoke that now, the damage cannot be undone. Be courageous, you have what no adoptee before you has had; a strong group of adult adoptees who know your story, who are behind you and will always be so.

OUR HISTORY

OUR HISTORY
BOOK 5: Lost Children of the Indian Adoption Projects