Here is the opinion in Navajo Nation v. Arizona Dept. of Economic Security:An excerpt:The Navajo Nation (“the Nation”) appeals the juvenile court’s judgment finding good cause to deviate from the placement preferences set forth in the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (“ICWA”), 25 U.S.C. §§ 1901 to 1963 (2006), and allowing the child (“Z.”) to remain with his current non-relative, non-Indian adoptive placement. We affirm. The juvenile court properly found good cause to deviate from ICWA placement preferences because the placement family provided good care for Z., Z. had attached and bonded with the family, Z. would suffer severe distress if he was removed from that placement, the placement family would expose Z. to his Navajo culture, and the placement family had been approved to adopt Z. While the interest of the Nation and the Congressionally-presumed interest of Z. in maintaining his heritage weighed against a finding of good cause to deviate from ICWA’s preferences, on this record we cannot say the court erred in weighing all these interests.
back-up blog (last updated 4/4/2025)
back-up blog (last updated 4/4/2025)
Pages
▼
A direct violation of both federal and international law. They charge other countries with genocide when they do that.
ReplyDeleteYes, anonymous, that is correct but in their mind, American Indian culture isn't important when we know it is... the AP story does go into more detail. It didn't say it was another Mormon adoption - it might just be.
ReplyDelete